*= Candidates with the ‘*’ asterisk after their name are currently pending due to an objection being filed to their candidacy. Objections to candidacy are heard before the State Ballot Law Commission, and can be filed by any registered voter in the district the candidate seeks election within, including challengers, members of a political party, or constituents. The objection process will conclude at the end of June, at which point, LWVMA will amend our VOTE411 listing with the most up-to-date information.The Massachusetts Governor’s Council (also called the Executive Council) is made up of eight elected Councillors. The Council meets weekly to record advice and consent on warrants for the state treasury, pardons and commutations, and to record advice and consent to gubernatorial appointments such as judges, clerk-magistrates, public administrators, members of the Parole Board, Appellate Tax Board, Industrial Accident Board and Industrial Accident Reviewing Board, notaries, and justices of the peace. They also approve notaries and justices of the peace. Councillors serve two-year terms with no term limits.
Campaign Phone
6173049979
I believe the Governor's Council is important because it serves as an independent check on some of the most significant appointments in state government, particularly judicial nominations. The judges we confirm make decisions that affect people's lives, families, and communities for decades. The Council's responsibility is to carefully review nominees, assess their qualifications, integrity, temperament, and commitment to justice, and ensure that they are prepared to serve fairly and impartially.
As a member of the Governor's Council, I would seek input from constituents, legal professionals, community leaders, advocacy organizations, victims' advocates, and others who are affected by the decisions that come before the Council. I would review nominees with an open mind, carefully consider a range of viewpoints, and evaluate how a nominee's background, experience, and judgment would contribute to the fair administration of justice.
Diversity is not limited to race, ethnicity, or gender. It also includes professional experience, geography, socioeconomic background, disability status, and life experience. A broad range of perspectives helps strengthen institutions, improve decision-making, and increase public confidence in government.
To identify potential bias, I would carefully review available data, examine patterns in appointments and outcomes, and ask questions about whether certain groups have historically faced barriers to consideration or advancement. I would also seek input from a diverse range of stakeholders and remain mindful of how implicit bias can influence decision-making, even when unintentional.
My goal would be to ensure that decisions are made consistently, fairly, and transparently, while maintaining high standards of integrity and public confidence. Every person deserves a review process that is impartial, thoughtful, and grounded in the facts, and I would work to uphold those principles in every matter before the Council.
My primary criterion for supporting or opposing a judicial nominee or justice of the peace is whether that individual has demonstrated the integrity, judgment, temperament, and commitment to fairness necessary to serve the people of Massachusetts. These positions carry significant responsibility and have a direct impact on people's lives, so I believe nominees must be qualified, ethical, impartial, and committed to upholding the law.
In evaluating nominees, I consider their professional experience, record of public service, respect for constitutional rights, ability to treat all individuals fairly, and capacity to make decisions free from bias or political influence.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
