Civil District Court Judge, District 113
District courts are trial courts of general jurisdiction of Texas. They have original jurisdiction in felony criminal cases, divorce cases, cases involving title to land, election contest cases, civil matters in which the amount of money or damages involved is $200 or more, and any matters in which jurisdiction is not placed in another trial court. The courts may specialize in civil, criminal, juvenile, or family law matters. Four-year term.
Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.
-
Rabeea Collier
(Dem)
-
Paul Sullivan
(Rep)
What will you do to promote the just, prompt, and affordable resolution of civil cases that come before your court?
What specific actions would you take to ensure the timely resolution of cases while maintaining fairness for all parties?
As the presiding judge for the past 8 years, I will continue to actively manage the docket, promptly address matters requiring judicial intervention, set clear expectations, and move cases efficiently toward settlement, disposition, or trial without sacrificing due process. Having presided over 90 jury trials and being double Board Certified in Civil Trial Law and Personal Injury Trial Law, I understand the real costs of delay. As Civil Administrative Judge and former chair of the Jury Committee overseeing jury operations for 80+ Harris County courts, I will continue using proven case-management and administrative practices to make our civil justice system efficient, accessible, and fair.
I will maintain firm but reasonable deadlines, promptly resolve disputes that impede case progress, minimize unnecessary continuances, and provide meaningful opportunities for every party to be heard. My approach reflects nearly eight years on the bench, 90 jury trials, and statewide judicial leadership, including serving as President of the Texas Association of District Judges, representing 500+ judges. My work on the Texas Bench Book and judiciary's COVID Response Task Force further informs my commitment to consistent, legally sound decisions and innovative court administration. Efficiency and fairness must work together.
Every case that reaches the Court deserves careful attention to the facts, the law, and the Constitution. Justice requires a judge to be fair and unbiased with the law and to apply the law equally regardless of who appears before the Court. Judges should apply the law as written, remain grounded in precedent, and approach every decision with discipline and restraint.
If a Judge fails to administer their cases quickly and efficiently then they are failing to do their job. Justice delayed is justice denied. Each case matters for the parties involved and prompt resolution makes a huge difference. Failure to have prompt resolutions costs the tax payers money. Attorneys are officers of the court and should be held to those expectations.
Maintaining clear docket control orders to establish realistic time deadlines for cases while using strategic status conferences to ensure case progression and timely resolution of cases. I would encourage the parties to come to mutual resolution while preserving their constitutionally protected rights to a speedy trial and the right to a jury.
To make a selection for a candidate you must first find your races. Would you like to find your races now?
You have already selected the maximum number of candidates for this race.
You must uncheck an existing selection before making another selection.