Wyoming House District 48
The Wyoming House of Representative is the lower house of the state legislature. Similar to the U.S. House of Representatives, they work with Senators to create laws, set the state budget, and determine state tax rates. State Representatives are elected to a two-year term with no term limits.
Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.
-
Darin McCann
(Rep)
-
James Wamsley
(Rep)
Why are you running for this office? Describe the experience and skills that make you the most qualified candidate.
Do you support the ballot initiative for a 50% reduction in property taxes, and why? If passed, should the state backfill the loss of local revenue? Please explain.
Do you support or oppose the sale or exchange of public lands? Please explain.
Is the current structure and funding level for public education appropriate? Please explain.
What is your opinion on the use of public funds for social services?
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Facebook
James Wamsley for House District 48
Campaign Phone
(307)389-2309
I believe that civility needs to be reintroduced to our legislative processes in Wyoming. Recent sessions have experienced infighting, extreme partisanship, and a narrow view of what is best for the people of Wyoming. 70% of our most valuable resource - our youth - leave the state and never come back. Business and development are stifled by poor information and a lack of vision.
I have over 20 years of experience in public service across two fire departments and several boards and committees. Prior to that, I worked in local industry for 20 years. I know what it's like to raise a family in Wyoming. I have worked rotating shifts, and commuted 40 miles each way daily.
I have a unique perspective beneficial for our legislative process.
No - I do not support the 50% initiaitive. Property taxes are the closest to the people and those over which they have the most control. Property taxes distribute the tax burden proportionately across all property classes.
The state will have no choice but to backfill the loss. Unfortunately, to effectively generate any meaningful revenue, sales and use tax will need to increase significantly. This really just changes where the tax bill is collected - increasing the tax burden on residents and industry alike.
I oppose the sale of public lands and the transfer of public lands to the state, except in certain circumstances. For better or worse, the federal government is probably a better steward than our State Government. In many of our communities, growth is stifled by land that is federally owned. These tracts could be used to provide affordable housing and expand neighborhoods. I support land exchanges on a very limited basis - not to pacify millionaires who want "pristine" land, exclusive access, or a better view.
I am not familiar enough to answer this question. I would like further information before offering an opinion.
Regarding social services, it has been my experience that you can provide funding for social services or pay for the adverse outcomes. Higher arrest rates, higher 911 call volume, degradation of the family unit, etc. Regarding mental health and suicide prevention, the use of public funds is probably the most effective manner of funding those services.
To make a selection for a candidate you must first find your races. Would you like to find your races now?
You have already selected the maximum number of candidates for this race.
You must uncheck an existing selection before making another selection.