Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

Public Education Commissioner District 3

Members of the Public Education Commission receive, review and approve or disapprove applications from charter schools that want to be chartered or renewed by the state. The Commission also may renew, suspend or revoke the charter of a state-chartered school. Term: Four years; no term limits.

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    DENNIS C DINGE
    (FWD)

  • Candidate picture

    JACOB A TRUJILLO
    (Dem)

Biographical Information

1. What qualifies you for this office?

2. What are your top three priorities for the Public Education Commission?

3. Should there be a cap on the total number of state charter schools? Please explain.

4. What is the purpose and need for state charter schools?

5. How should the Public Education Commission assess the financial stability of schools before authorizing or renewing a charter?

6. How will you evaluate the educational performance of state charter schools?

Education BS Electrical Engineering, MS Physcis PhD Physics
Campaign Phone 505-818-8933
Campaign Email dennis@dingeforpec3.org
Campaign Website http://dingeforpec3.org
Occupation Physicist
Filing County Bernalillo
mailingaddress 3313 LA MANCHA DR NW
mailingcity ALBUQUERQUE
mailingzip 87104-3029
mailingstate NM
Campaign Endorsements Damian Lara Bernilillo County Assessor, Maralyn Beck Executive Director New Mexico Child First Network, Mark Boslough world renowned scientist and former Republican NM state house candidate.
First of all I'm a dad to two kids who have attended Charter Schools. I have been an educator. I was a professor for several years. I am a scientist and will rigorously pursue data driven solutions to improve public charter schools. My wife is a former APS high school science teacher and is currently an educator giving presentations to dozens of APS elementary schools each year on water production, use and conservation for the water authority. She is an excellent sounding board and advisor for what it's like to be a public school teacher in New Mexico and what students at various schools are like.
The evaluation of Charter schools must be based on scientifically sound, transparent and equitable methods. The criteria used by the PEC to determine this should be reviewed annually.

Charter schools should focus on eliminating any barriers to attendance for the at risk and disadvantaged. Charter schools must satisfy the requirements of the Martinez/Yazzie court ruling.

Public charter schools are the research and development branch of the public school system. I will emphasize making sure best practices from from public charter schools are transferred to all public schools and work to make sure transfer mechanisms are available.
No, with the caveat that funding for public charter schools should not affect the per student funding of other public schools. I will encourage more public charter schools that focus beyond the basics and into areas of study that kids are passionate about and for which they want to engage. There are currently about 100 charter schools and a maximum of 15 can be added a year. I don't believe there is a danger of the number becoming intractable in the near future.
In addition to being places to explore innovation which I mention elsewhere, charter schools provide the opportunities for students to engage in what they are passionate about. Without that some students will check out and possibly drop out. I get that because I went through that. My high school in rural SC didn't have physics or calculus and it would be fair to say I wasn't engaged. I got into Clemson by the skin of my teeth. I was provisionally accepted with the caveat that I take math classes before the fall semester. Once there I thrived. I would have loved to have gone to a STEM charter high school but they didn't exist. If we want to improve student outcomes and engagement I think they are not a nice to have but a have to have.
All state authorized charter schools are required to have an annual audit. The audit will include the audited financial statements of the school along with any audit findings and recommendations on the charter school's financial operating systems. A review of these financials and reports from the annual audit should provide as a basis for renewal. The PED's Budget Office should be requested to provide key indicators of financial sustainability. These indicators should include what the schools student membership was projected to be and what it actually is since student membership determines actual funding. The PEC should check that the school is meeting state financial reporting deadlines and contractual financial compliance items.
Charter schools should be evaluated against their peers and against similar student populations. If the data exist this is how as a scientist I would do it. I would take the anonymized data for each student in the charter school. I would find anonymized doubles for each student at a variety of different but similar non-charter public schools. Then I would compare outcomes. It is important to I think to eliminate any bias know or unknown from comparing to just one school or a few. If the data is not available I would pursue the best unbiased method that could be done with the data that is available. For aspects of the charter school curricula that may not exist elsewhere the educational performance will necessarily need to be case by case
Education University of New Mexico
Campaign Phone 5059487162
Campaign Email Trujilloforpec3@gmail.com
Occupation Field Representative, Congressional Office of NM-01
I bring both lived experience and proven public service. I attended a D-3 charter school, AIMS, from 6th grade through 12th, so I understand that system firsthand. At 26, I’m only eight years removed from it. I’ve seen the opportunities charter schools can provide, and where they can fall short.

For nearly five years, I’ve served as a congressional staffer, worked in nonprofit roles across my community, and now serve as Chair of the Democratic Party of Bernalillo County. In each role, my job has been the same: listen to people, act on what I hear, and report back with results.

That experience has kept me closely connected to families, educators, and students across New Mexico. I understand how decisions made truly impact our communities.
First, accountability. Charter schools must meet strong academic, financial, and legal standards, as well as the expectations of the communities they serve. Approval is not a blank check, and renewal should reflect real performance.

Second, equity. As a Hispanic student from a low income family, I have seen gaps firsthand. I am grateful for the progress New Mexico has made, but we must keep going. I will always push for equitable schools and equitable policy. As a Commissioner, I won’t be scared to stand for what’s right and to push for progress.

Third, more community-centered decisions and engagement. Do you know what the PEC is or does? We need to do better and speak to schools, students, and families more publicly and more often.
A fixed cap alone doesn’t solve any issue. The real question is impact and spending. We should not approve new schools that duplicate services, destabilize districts, or pull critical funding from existing public schools.

I support a cautious, needs-based approach that we are only approving charters when there is a clear gap, strong community support, and a sustainable plan. If growth begins to harm the broader public education system, the PEC has a responsibility to slow or stop expansion.
Charter schools are meant to provide innovative approaches and meet specific needs not currently being met. At their best, they offer specialized programs or new models that benefit students. Just like how AIMS prepped me for college and put me ahead in credits, students can really benefit from these new models.

Their purpose is not to replace or compete with public schools. When done poorly, they can increase inequity and divert resources. Their role should be limited, intentional, and always aligned with strengthening, not weakening, the broader public education system.
For first time applications, the PEC should require detailed, realistic financial plans, including enrollment projections, budgets, community buy-in, and long-term sustainability.

We must be cautious of overly optimistic projections or unclear funding sources.

Approval is not the end. Ongoing monitoring is critical and will be my job. If a school shows signs of financial instability, the PEC must act early to protect students and public funds.

To help with renewal questions, I will request two yearly meetings with each D-3 school. One for faculty and leadership. One for families and students.
Performance should be evaluated using multiple measures, not just test scores. Our students deserve more. We must look at student growth, graduation rates, attendance, community feedback, and how well schools serve all populations.

Just as important is whether schools meet the goals in their charter and contribute positively to the broader system. Schools that consistently underperform, fail to show impact, or do not serve students equitably should be required to improve or face non-renewal.

As your next Commissioner, I’m not an automatic yes or no. I care about public education, I care about our communities, and I care about the future of this State. I will work hard in this role to always promote student, and community, success. Thanks.