Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

State Representative 98

Serves 2-year terms with a limit of 4 consecutive terms. There are 120 House members. The 2025 salary is $29,697 plus (travel and subsistence). Only requirement is to pass a balanced state budget.Click here to view July 20th candidate forum: https://youtu.be/9IR2KJjgfvw

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    Keith Abel
    (Dem)

  • Candidate picture

    Mitchell Rosenwald
    (Dem)

Biographical Information

What are the two most important challenges facing Florida and, if elected, what actions will you take to address them within your first six months in office? ¿Cuáles son los dos desafíos más importantes que enfrenta Florida y, si es elegido/a, qué acciones tomará para abordarlos durante sus primeros seis meses en el cargo?

If documentary proof of US citizenship becomes necessary in order to register to vote, how would you help those Floridians, especially women, who no longer have or don’t have easy and affordable access to documents to prove citizenship, such as certified birth and marriage certificates? Si se requiere prueba documental de ciudadanía estadounidense para registrarse para votar, ¿cómo ayudaría a los floridanos, especialmente a las mujeres, que ya no tienen o no tienen acceso fácil y asequible a documentos que prueben su ciudadanía, como certificados de nacimiento o matrimonio?

Insufficient affordable housing is hurting Florida families and limiting Florida’s economy. What state measures do you support to address the affordable housing crisis, beyond tax and insurance reform, for both homeowners and renters? La falta de vivienda asequible está perjudicando a las familias de Florida y limitando la economía del estado. ¿Qué medidas estatales apoya para abordar la crisis de vivienda asequible, más allá de reformas fiscales y de seguros, tanto para propietarios como para inquilinos?

Under what circumstances would you support access to abortion? ¿En qué circunstancias apoyaría el acceso al aborto?

With respect to preemption and home rule, is the relationship and balance of power between state and local governments in Florida appropriately addressing local issues or how should it be redefined? Con respecto a la preeminencia estatal (preemption) y la autonomía local (home rule), ¿cree que la relación y el equilibrio de poder entre los gobiernos estatales y locales en Florida están abordando adecuadamente los problemas locales? o ¿Cómo debería redefinirse?

Equitable and affordable access to healthcare is declining, in part due to the decrease of federal insurance subsidies. At the same time, more Medicaid costs are being pushed onto the states. How should the state address these issues? El acceso equitativo y asequible a la atención médica está disminuyendo, en parte debido a la reducción de los subsidios federales de seguros. Al mismo tiempo, más costos de Medicaid se están trasladando a los estados. ¿Cómo debería el estado abordar estos problemas?

Polls indicate the public is more concerned about the cost of property insurance than property taxes. What is your view and why? Las encuestas indican que el público está más preocupado por el costo del seguro de propiedad que por los impuestos a la propiedad. ¿Cuál es su opinión y por qué?

Age 55
Education Master of Science in Logistics and Supply Chain Management; Bachelor of Science in Public Relations and Marketing.
Hometown Oakland Park
County Broward
Campaign Twitter Handle @AbelForFlorida
Instagram abelflorida1
LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/keith-a-abel/?skipRedirect=true
Florida’s two most urgent challenges are affordability and access to healthcare. In my first six months, I will support legislation that lowers property-insurance costs through stronger rate transparency, tougher oversight of insurer finances, expanded mitigation grants, and incentives that attract stable competition. I will also fight for full funding of affordable and workforce housing programs. On healthcare, I will support expanding Medicaid, protecting coverage for children, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities, strengthening provider networks, and reducing prescription-drug costs. I will work across party lines, meet with local governments and community organizations, and file or co-sponsor practical bills that deliver measurable relief to working families.
Only eligible U.S. citizens should vote, but proving citizenship should never become a financial or administrative barrier for lawful voters. If documentary proof is required, I would support state funding for free certified birth, marriage, divorce, adoption, and name-change records; mobile assistance clinics; and direct coordination among elections offices, vital-statistics agencies, clerks, and motor-vehicle offices. Voters whose names changed, especially women, should be allowed to present a clear chain of documents without repeated fees or unreasonable delays. I would also support provisional registration, adequate notice, and a fair opportunity to correct missing documentation before an eligible voter is removed or denied registration.
Florida must increase the supply of homes that working families, seniors, veterans, and young adults can actually afford. I support fully funding the Sadowski housing trust funds and preventing those dollars from being diverted. I would expand down-payment and closing-cost assistance, low-interest rehabilitation loans, and support for first-time buyers. For renters, I support incentives for mixed-income and workforce housing, preservation of existing affordable units, stronger protections against unsafe conditions and retaliation, and targeted rental assistance for families facing temporary hardship. The state should also help local governments convert suitable public or commercial property into housing while requiring long-term affordability and responsible development near jobs and transportation.
I support access to abortion before fetal viability, with decisions made by the patient in consultation with a qualified medical professional—not politicians. After viability, I support access when necessary to protect the life or serious health of the pregnant patient, in cases of fatal fetal abnormality, and when a pregnancy results from rape, incest, or human trafficking. Medical emergencies should never be delayed by vague laws or fear of prosecution. I also oppose criminalizing patients or healthcare professionals for providing lawful care. At the same time, I support policies that reduce unintended pregnancies and support families, including access to contraception, prenatal care, maternal healthcare, childcare, and accurate health education.
Florida has moved too far toward state preemption and away from meaningful home rule. State government should establish clear minimum standards on issues that are genuinely statewide, but cities and counties must retain authority to respond to local conditions involving housing, land use, transportation, resilience, public safety, and neighborhood quality of life. I would oppose broad or retroactive preemption that blocks reasonable local solutions without demonstrating a compelling statewide need. I would support requiring public notice, fiscal analysis, and consultation with affected local governments before new preemptions are enacted. The best balance is partnership: statewide protections where uniformity is necessary and local flexibility where communities understand their needs best.
Florida should respond by expanding Medicaid, maximizing available federal matching funds, and protecting coverage for children, seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and low-income working adults. I would support a state affordability program to help eligible residents with premiums and out-of-pocket costs when federal subsidies decline. We must also strengthen Medicaid provider networks, raise reimbursement where shortages limit access, expand community health centers and telehealth, and reduce prescription-drug costs through greater transparency and purchasing power. Any Medicaid savings should come from cutting administrative waste and excessive contractor profits—not reducing benefits or making it harder for eligible Floridians to enroll and remain covered.
I agree that property-insurance costs are the more immediate crisis for many Floridians. Property taxes are significant, but homestead protections and assessment limits provide many long-term homeowners with some predictability. Insurance premiums, deductibles, non-renewals, and coverage restrictions can rise sharply and threaten a family’s ability to keep a mortgage or remain in its home. Market improvements should be recognized, but families need to see relief in their actual bills. I support stronger rate transparency and regulatory oversight, requiring savings to reach policyholders, expanding home-hardening grants, protecting consumers from unfair cancellations, and encouraging responsible competition. Property-tax relief should remain targeted so it does not weaken schools, public safety, or essential local services.
Age 55
Education PhD - University of Maryland, MSW - University of Maryland, MA - Syracuse University, BA - Salisbury State University
Hometown Elkton, Maryland
County Broward
Instagram mitchrosenwald
Campaign Phone 9542535641
Campaign Mailing Address 1353 NE 34 St
Oakland Park, FL 33334
1) Cost of living in housing. In my first six months when I was first elected, I sponsored a bill to help low-income seniors with their housing. This past year, I sponsored a bill - and it was just signed by the Governor - to help veterans with rental housing via landlord incentives. Therefore, I will continue to sponsor a bill relating to cost of living of housing within my first six months.

2) Cost of property insurance - This past session, I cosponsored legislation that would allow Florida to opt into a national risk pool. What this does is allow Floridians to share the insurance risk with people from other states who face their own natural disasters. With more people sharing the risk, the premiums for property insurance should decrease.
Access to attaining documents was the reason I voted against this legislation. Attaining a new birth or marriage certificate takes time - and there is little time to get these documents if women move to Florida right before the election. Also, this applies to women (and men) who reside in Florida and may have had to flee their homes due to domestic violence and do not have access to these documents.
Here is one innovative idea.

Several weeks ago, the Governor signed my Housing for Veterans bill into law. What this does is provide a policy framework for landlords to receive financial incentives to hold apartments for veterans in need of housing as well as provide financial incentives for damages beyond what a security deposit will pay for in the event the veteran leaves and such damages accrue. This coming session, pending my re-election, I plan to file the companion bill to include Trust Funds as the funding mechanism for this law.

I mention this because I think this is an area - landlord incentives - which can grow to help an array of vulnerable populations as they stabilize in housing. This can apply to workforce housing, rentals for people leaving prison, etc. I think there is great policy opportunity to expand landlord incentives throughout the state.
I support access to abortion akin to Roe v Wade with the trimester model.
No. The state precludes local rule in too many areas. This extends from housing to the horrible anti-DEI law. Local governments are closest to the people and the balance has been tipped too much toward home rule exemptions.
The simple answer is for Florida to accept Medicaid Expansion. I support this though the current Governor has neglected to do so.

In addition, I have seen this issue firsthand as I sit on the Health Budget Subcommittee in the House of Representatives. Some of the problem is waste and mismanagement with the Agency on Healthcare Administration. The Subcommittee did investigative and important oversight work to reduce waste in the Medicaid space. There are actually more regular funds that can be drawn down but ACHA has not been managed appropriately.
These polls are consistent with my interaction with constituents. They cite property insurance much more than property taxes as an issue - probably because property insurance is increasing so exponentially compared to property taxes which have caps built in.