Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

MONTANA HOUSE DISTRICT 55

State House Representative – the office of state representative serves in the Montana legislature’s lower house. There are 100 representatives who are elected from districts. Representatives are elected to 2-year terms. Representatives propose and vote on proposed laws during the legislative sessions that meet for 90 days in odd-numbered years, and provide oversight of state agencies and study issues through interim committees that meet between sessions. Representatives are limited to four consecutive 2-year terms.

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    BRAD BARKER
    (Rep)

  • Candidate picture

    KIM GILLAN
    (Dem)

Biographical Information

Question 1: Please briefly provide the following information: place (town or county and state) of birth, age as of election day 2024, place (town or county) of permanent residency, occupation/employer, and education. How do these things and your other life experiences qualify you to be an effective legislator?

Question 2: What do you consider to be the most pressing issues facing Montana heading into the 2025 session and what legislation would you propose and/or support to address these issues?

Question 3: Many Montanans are concerned about rising residential property taxes, which primarily fund local government services such as schools, counties and city/town programs but are calculated through a system set by the Legislature. What changes to the state tax system, if any, would you support to provide property tax relief while maintaining sufficient revenue for essential services?

Question 4: Considering the state’s role in mental and physical health care services, especially in helping cover the costs of services available to lower-income Montanans, what additional steps, if any, do you believe the Legislature should take to enhance health care access and promote Montanans’ health?

Question 5: Many education leaders are concerned that the state’s existing school funding formula isn’t keeping up with the costs of educating students. What proposals, if any, would you support to ensure adequate and sustainable long-term funding is available for public pre-K–12, college/university, and vocational education programs?

Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Campaign Website http://Kim4CarbonCounty.com
I have recently retired from many years of working in the health care policy, workforce development and government relations arena. I have owned a home in Red Lodge since 2000 and it became my permanent residence in 2013, after 20 years living, working and raising a family in Billings, MT. I previously had the honor of serving as the State Legislator (House and Senate) for 16 years for the Billings Heights. During my prior legislative tenure, I worked hard to listen to my constituents and focus on initiatives which promoted public education (lots of school age children in the Heights), fair taxation, small business and workforce development along with ensuring our community and residents had an effective and common sense voice
Folks in Carbon County, a rural community, have shared they want the legislature to focus on pocketbook issues, such as property tax increases, housing affordability, workforce that are critical for rural towns. I served on the Taxation Committees in the past, and worked/voted for homeowner/small business property tax rate reduction--a bipartisan and simple approach used in past sessions. Health care is critical to our community, as we've had several nursing home closures, and I will work on initiatives to reauthorization Medicaid. Recent state actions to. purge Medicaid roles will negatively impact health care for everyone, and jeopardize the financial viability for rural health care providers. Public Education and workforce are also key
As noted, during previous reappraisals, there was bipartisan support to reduce the property tax rates for homeowners and small business. This approach (recommended in Nov, 2022) was ignored and resulted in over $200 million in permanent property tax increases for homeowners/small businesses. The blame on local governments is factually incorrect. We need to lower the rates and stop the ongoing shift of property taxes from large corporations to homeowners. Homeowners are now paying over 50% of property tax; we need to adjustthe appraisal process/valuation for other classes of property tax to ensure fairness, expand senior citizen exemptions (on property tax), include renters in our efforts and continue expanding housing.
First, the state needs to take quick meaningful action to requalify those eligible for Medicaid! The state leadership kicked off 60% due to procedural issues, This means.,leaving low income families without access to care—including mental health and also forefeiting millions of dollars in Federal funding(our tax dollars). Rural facilities are at risk of closure (2 nursing homes closed in RL)The legislature should pass legislation to renew and fund the state share of Medicaid Expansion and reinstate 12 month eligibility. The legislature, unfortunately, may need to "micro manage" this process; i.e. add temporary staff. We also need to expand health access in rural areas through incentives to recruit and retain—including workforce housing.
Yes, I believe that education is critical to our children and Montana’s economy; School funding is complicated however we need to 1) increase base funding 2) avoid shifting to local property owners 3) stop sipping money from public schools through charter schools and tax incentives for private schools., Rural areas may need additional help to recruit and retain teachers, I would propose changes to the school funding formula to increase the state share and help students obtain workforce training or college credits while high school (other states do this) and consider putting more funding in programs rather than buildings.