PROPOSITION 317: REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
PROPOSITION 317; REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Official Title: AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 41, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 41-4256. Descriptive Title: DECLARES THAT DRUG CARTELS ARE TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS; DIRECTS THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO DO EVERYTHING IN ITS AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS DRUG CARTELS. Ballot measures approved by Arizona voters are difficult to change. Constitutional amendments can be changed only if voters approve another constitutional amendment. Voter-approved laws are protected by Arizona’s Voter Protection Act, which prohibits the Legislature from repealing them and allows amendments only with a three-fourths vote of each legislative chamber when the amendment furthers the measure’s original purpose.Impact on ArizonansA YES vote will enact a state law declaring drug cartels to be terrorist organizations and require the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to use all authority available to it to address threats posed by drug cartels. The law would also establish definitions of “drug cartel” and “threat” and specify that the declaration does not support a claim for asylum under federal law.A NO vote will maintain current Arizona law. Drug cartels would not receive the new designation as terrorist organizations under this measure, and AZDHS would continue operating under its existing statutory responsibilities and authority.BackgroundProposition 317, referred to the ballot as HCR2055, was placed on the ballot by the Arizona Legislature as a proposed change to state law concerning drug cartels and the Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDHS).AZDHS already has responsibilities under Arizona law to develop policies, plans, and programs to help the state prevent and respond to terrorism, cybersecurity threats, and other critical hazards. The Department may also request and receive homeland-security funding and distribute eligible federal funds to local jurisdictions and other organizations.The Legislature tied the measure to Arizona's 2024 Proposition 314, the Secure the Border Act. HCR 2055's legislative findings cite cartel involvement in human smuggling, fentanyl trafficking, and other drug trafficking and describe these activities as threats to public safety.Proposition 317 would declare drug cartels to be terrorist organizations under Arizona law and direct AZDHS to use the authority it already has to address threats posed by drug cartels.Key ProvisionsDeclare drug cartels to be terrorist organizations under Arizona law.Direct the Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDHS) to address cartel threats by requiring the Department to do everything within its existing authority to address threats posed by drug cartels.Define “drug cartel” broadly as an ongoing formal or informal association whose members or associates engage individually or collectively in human smuggling; drug trafficking for profit; or specified acts of terrorism, including certain completed or preparatory offenses involving deadly weapons, weapons of mass destruction, or serious physical injury intended to influence government, disrupt public services, intimidate or coerce civilians, or further the objectives of a terrorist organization.Define a “threat” as something designed to disturb, violate, or harm rights guaranteed by the Arizona or U.S. Constitution, or to harm the public safety, health, or general welfare of the people.Address federal asylum claims by specifying that the declaration of drug cartels as terrorist organizations does not support a person's claim for asylum under federal law.Fiscal Analysis The Senate fact sheet states that there is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with Proposition 317. The measure directs AZDHS to address cartel threats using authority the Department already has and does not itself establish a new appropriation.For more information:Official Ballot LanguageArizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee: NonePublicly filed arguments for Publicly filed arguments againstDownload 2026 BALLOT PROPOSITIONS: MEET VOTE411LWVAZ nonpartisan guide to all the 2026 ballot propositions
Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.
-
Yes - For the Measure
-
No - Against the Measure
A YES Vote Means
A YES vote will enact a state law declaring drug cartels to be terrorist organizations and require the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to use all authority available to it to address threats posed by drug cartels. The law would also establish definitions of “drug cartel” and “threat” and specify that the declaration does not support a claim for asylum under federal law.
Treating drug cartels as terrorist organizations reflects the seriousness of the threat they pose. Cartel involvement in violence, human smuggling, and drug trafficking goes beyond ordinary criminal activity and warrants treatment as a homeland-security concern.
Addressing fentanyl and other drug trafficking could help protect Arizona communities. Cartel trafficking is viewed as a significant public-safety threat, particularly because of the harm caused by fentanyl and other illegal drugs to individuals, families, and communities.
Directing Arizona's homeland-security agency to focus on cartel threats strengthens the state's response. Requiring the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to use everything within its existing authority would ensure that addressing cartel threats is an explicit state responsibility.
Making the directive a requirement could provide continuity in state policy. Requiring AZDHS to address cartel threats, rather than simply allowing it to do so, could help maintain the state's focus on cartels regardless of changes in agency leadership or priorities.
Candidate has not yet responded.
A NO Vote Means
A NO vote will maintain current Arizona law. Drug cartels would not receive the new designation as terrorist organizations under this measure, and AZDHS would continue operating under its existing statutory responsibilities and authority.
Candidate has not yet responded.
The measure could be largely symbolic. Declaring drug cartels to be terrorist organizations does not itself create new criminal penalties, enforcement powers, or programs, so opponents question what practical effect the designation would have.
The measure does not give the Arizona Department of Homeland Security new authority. It directs the Department to do everything within its existing authority, raising questions about what additional actions would result from passage.
AZDHS is a homeland security and coordination agency, not primarily a law enforcement agency. Opponents question how much the directive would change enforcement against cartels, given that the Department's existing responsibilities focus on planning, coordination, preparedness, grants, and responding to security threats.
The definition of “drug cartel” is broad. An organization could fall within the measure's definition if its members or associates engage in human smuggling or drug trafficking for profit, without separately satisfying the measure's specified criteria for an act of terrorism. Opponents could therefore question whether the “terrorist organization” designation is broader than the ordinary meaning voters may associate with that term.
To make a selection for a candidate you must first find your races. Would you like to find your races now?
You have already selected the maximum number of candidates for this race.
You must uncheck an existing selection before making another selection.