Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

PROPOSITION 318; REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO STUDENT ATHLETICS

PROPOSITION 318; REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO STUDENT ATHLETICS Official Title: REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO STUDENT ATHLETICS Descriptive Title: REQUIRES ALL SCHOOLS AND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS TO DESIGNATE ATHLETIC TEAMS AS MALE, FEMALE, OR COED BASED ON THE BIOLOGICAL SEX OF THE ATHLETES AS DEFINED AT BIRTH; PROHIBITS THESE ENTITIES FROM AUTHORIZING USE OF PRIVATE SPACES NOT DESIGNATED FOR A PERSON'S SEX. Ballot measures approved by Arizona voters are difficult to change. Constitutional amendments can be changed only if voters approve another constitutional amendment. Voter-approved laws are protected by Arizona’s Voter Protection Act, which prohibits the Legislature from repealing them and allows amendments only with a three-fourths vote of each legislative chamber when the amendment furthers the measure’s original purpose.Impact on ArizonansA YES vote will change Arizona law governing school athletics by requiring schools and athletic associations to designate interscholastic and intramural teams based on sex as recorded at birth on an athlete's original birth certificate. Female-designated teams could not be open to male athletes. Beginning January 1, 2027, schools and athletic associations also could not authorize an individual to use restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, or other private spaces integral to athletic participation that are not designated for that individual's sex. The measure would also expand provisions allowing lawsuits for violations.A NO vote will maintain current Arizona law governing interscholastic and intramural athletic teams and would not add the measure's new requirements concerning restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, and other private athletic spaces or its expanded provisions concerning athletic associations and legal actions.BackgroundProposition 318, referred to the ballot as HCR2003, concerns participation in school athletics and the use of certain private athletic facilities. Arizona law currently requires interscholastic and intramural teams sponsored by covered schools to be designated as male, female, or coed based on biological sex. It prohibits male students from participating on female-designated teams.Proposition 318 would revise and expand these requirements to schools and athletic associations and add requirements governing the use of restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, and other private spaces integral to athletic participation. For purposes of the measure, “sex” means an individual's biological status as male or female as recorded at birth on the individual's original birth certificate.Key ProvisionsProposition 318 concerns participation in school athletics and the use of certain private athletic facilities. Arizona law currently requires interscholastic and intramural teams sponsored by covered schools to be designated as male, female, or coed based on biological sex. It prohibits male students from participating on female-designated teams.Proposition 318 would revise and expand these requirements to schools and athletic associations and add requirements governing the use of restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, and other private spaces integral to athletic participation. For purposes of the measure, “sex” means an individual's biological status as male or female as recorded at birth on the individual's original birth certificate.Fiscal AnalysisThe legislative materials do not identify an anticipated impact on the state General Fund. The measure could result in costs for schools or athletic associations associated with implementation or litigation, but the materials reviewed do not provide an estimate of those potential costs. For more information:Official Ballot LanguageArizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee: NonePublicly filed arguments for Publicly filed arguments againstDownload 2026 BALLOT PROPOSITIONS: MEET VOTE411LWVAZ nonpartisan guide to all the 2026 ballot propositions

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    Yes - For the Measure

  • Candidate picture

    No - Against the Measure

A YES Vote Means A YES vote will change Arizona law governing school athletics by requiring schools and athletic associations to designate interscholastic and intramural teams based on sex as recorded at birth on an athlete's original birth certificate. Female-designated teams could not be open to male athletes. Beginning January 1, 2027, schools and athletic associations also could not authorize an individual to use restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, or other private spaces integral to athletic participation that are not designated for that individual's sex. The measure would also expand provisions allowing lawsuits for violations.
Sex-based athletic categories protect fair competition for female athletes. Supporters argue that physiological differences between males and females, including differences in strength, speed, muscle mass and other physical characteristics, can create competitive advantages and that female athletes should compete in a separate category to maintain a level playing field.

The measure protects athletic opportunities for girls and women. Supporters contend that allowing male athletes to compete on female teams can affect roster positions, records, championships, medals, and scholarship opportunities. They argue that Proposition 318 would preserve these opportunities by reserving female-designated teams for athletes who are female.

Separate female athletic categories can help protect physical safety. Supporters argue that differences in size, strength and other physical characteristics can create greater injury risks for female athletes in some sports, particularly contact or collision sports, and that sex-based participation rules provide an important safety protection.

Sex-designated locker rooms, showers and restrooms protect privacy. Supporters say athletes should have access to private athletic spaces designated by sex and argue that the measure would provide girls and women with greater privacy and security in locker rooms, showers, restrooms, and other private spaces associated with athletics.

Clear statewide standards would provide consistency and accountability. Supporters argue that requiring teams to be designated as male, female, or coeducational, and defining sex according to an individual's original birth certificate, establishes a consistent rule for schools and athletic associations. They also support allowing athletes and schools to seek legal remedies when the requirements are violated.
Candidate has not yet responded.
A NO Vote Means A NO vote will maintain current Arizona law governing interscholastic and intramural athletic teams and would not add the measure's new requirements concerning restrooms, locker rooms, shower rooms, and other private athletic spaces or its expanded provisions concerning athletic associations and legal actions.
Candidate has not yet responded.
The measure imposes a broad statewide rule to address a very small number of transgender athletes. Opponents argue that it applies the same sex-based requirements across different ages, schools and levels of competition rather than allowing schools and athletic organizations to develop policies appropriate to particular sports and circumstances.

Transgender students would lose opportunities to participate and belong. Opponents contend that excluding transgender girls from female teams and restricting their use of athletic facilities denies them the educational, social and emotional benefits of school sports, including teamwork, confidence, friendship and a sense of belonging.

Enforcement could create privacy concerns for all students. Because the measure defines sex according to an individual's original birth certificate but does not specify a process for verifying sex, opponents argue that schools, coaches and athletic organizations could face difficult questions about how to enforce the requirements. They worry that girls whose appearance or physical characteristics do not conform to expectations could also face questioning or scrutiny.

The measure could expose schools and athletic organizations to additional lawsuits and costs. Proposition 318 creates private rights of action, allowing athletes and schools to seek damages, attorneys' fees, and other relief for violations. Opponents argue that this could increase litigation and divert taxpayer and school resources away from education and student services.

Schools and athletic organizations should retain greater flexibility in addressing these issues. Opponents argue that decisions involving athletic eligibility, safety, privacy and student well-being should be handled through educators, families and athletic organizations rather than through a statewide mandate that applies from K–12 schools through colleges and universities.