Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

PROPOSITION 141; PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO TAXATION

PROPOSITION 141; PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO TAXATION Official Title: AMENDING ARTICLE IX, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, BY ADDING SECTION 26. Descriptive Title: PROHIBITS TAXES OR FEES BASED ON VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED AND LAWS MONITORING OR LIMITING VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED WITHOUT CONSENT. Ballot measures approved by Arizona voters are difficult to change. Constitutional amendments can be changed only if voters approve another constitutional amendment. Voter-approved laws are protected by Arizona’s Voter Protection Act, which prohibits the Legislature from repealing them and allows amendments only with a three-fourths vote of each legislative chamber when the amendment furthers the measure’s original purpose.Impact on ArizonansA YES vote will amend the Arizona Constitution to prohibit state and local governments from imposing a tax or fee based on the number of miles a person travels in a motor vehicle. It would also prohibit government laws or rules that monitor or limit a person’s vehicle miles traveled unless the person voluntarily consents. Certain interstate commercial-vehicle fuel-tax and registration agreements, as well as government-owned and operated vehicles, would be exempt.A NO vote will leave the Arizona Constitution unchanged and would not establish the proposed constitutional prohibition on state or local taxes, fees, monitoring, or limits based on vehicle miles traveled. Current laws and governmental authority would remain in place.BackgroundProposition 141, referred to the ballot in 2025 as SCR1004, would add Article IX, Section 26 to the Arizona Constitution. is a proposed amendment to the Arizona Constitution concerning vehicle miles traveled. It would prohibit state and local governments from imposing taxes or fees based on miles traveled, or from adopting laws or rules to monitor or limit vehicle miles traveled, without voluntary consent. Exceptions apply to certain interstate commercial-vehicle agreements and government-owned and operated vehicles. Key ProvisionsProhibit mileage-based taxes or fees. State and local governments could not impose a tax or fee based on a person's vehicle miles traveled.Prohibit government monitoring or limits on vehicle miles traveled without voluntary consent. State and local governments could not enact laws or rules to monitor or limit a person’s vehicle miles traveled unless the person voluntarily agrees.Exempt certain interstate commercial-vehicle agreements. The prohibition would not apply to interstate agreements used to administer fuel taxes or registration fees for commercial vehicles operating in more than one state.Exempt government vehicles. The restrictions would not apply to motor vehicles owned and operated by the state or another public entity.Fiscal Analysis The legislative fiscal analysis identifies no anticipated impact on the state General Fund from Proposition 141.For more informationOfficial Ballot LanguageArizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee: NonePublicly filed arguments for Publicly filed arguments againstDownload 2026 BALLOT PROPOSITIONS: MEET VOTE411LWVAZ nonpartisan guide to all the 2026 ballot propositions

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    Yes - For the Measure

  • Candidate picture

    No - Against the Measure

A YES Vote Means A YES vote will amend the Arizona Constitution to prohibit state and local governments from imposing a tax or fee based on the number of miles a person travels in a motor vehicle. It would also prohibit government laws or rules that monitor or limit a person’s vehicle miles traveled unless the person voluntarily consents. Certain interstate commercial-vehicle fuel-tax and registration agreements, as well as government-owned and operated vehicles, would be exempt.
Protecting driver privacy would prevent state and local governments from requiring people to consent to systems that monitor their vehicle miles traveled as a condition of complying with a mileage-monitoring program.

Preventing mileage-based taxes or fees would protect drivers from a new method of transportation taxation based on how many miles they drive.

Protecting people who depend heavily on their vehicles could prevent disproportionate costs for rural residents, long-distance commuters, tradespeople, contractors, delivery workers, and others who must drive significant distances for work or daily needs.

Preserving freedom of travel would prevent state and local governments from adopting mandatory rules or laws that monitor or limit the number of miles a person travels by motor vehicle.

Placing these protections in the Arizona Constitution would make the restrictions more permanent and prevent future state or local governments from establishing mileage-based taxes, fees, or mandatory monitoring or limits without another constitutional change approved by voters.
Candidate has not yet responded.
A NO Vote Means A NO vote will leave the Arizona Constitution unchanged and would not establish the proposed constitutional prohibition on state or local taxes, fees, monitoring, or limits based on vehicle miles traveled. Current laws and governmental authority would remain in place.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Removing mileage-based fees as a future transportation funding option could make it more difficult for Arizona to address long-term road and infrastructure needs as fuel tax revenues decline due to more fuel-efficient and electric vehicles.

Allowing Arizona to study and consider different transportation funding approaches would preserve flexibility as vehicles and transportation technology evolve. Opponents argue that placing a prohibition in the Constitution could prevent consideration of mileage-based approaches before their costs and benefits are fully evaluated.

Finding ways for all vehicles to contribute to road funding is increasingly important as electric vehicles and other vehicles that use little or no gasoline contribute less through fuel taxes. Opponents argue that a mileage-based fee could be one option for relating road-use contributions to miles traveled.

Preserving state and local flexibility to address transportation needs could help Arizona respond to population growth, rising construction and maintenance costs, and changing travel patterns rather than permanently removing one potential policy option.

Placing the prohibition in the Arizona Constitution could make future changes more difficult. Opponents argue that transportation funding needs and technology will continue to evolve and that the state should not constitutionally restrict future policymakers from considering mileage-based approaches.