1. Our roads and highways struggle to accommodate the current number of vehicles let alone an increase if DART is discontinued. North Central Texas is expected to grow from 8.6 million to 12.3 million residents by 2050.
2. Public transportation helps reduce car traffic, road congestion, air pollution and lack of parking.
3. University Park has so far managed to fund city services at a high level without the 1% sales tax. Its property tax rate is near the lowest city tax rate in the County.
4. DART’s bus, GoLink and Paratransit options help the elderly and disabled. The city has not, as of publication, committed to alternatives other than paratransit should the vote be “no” and these services are discontinued the next day.
5. The city will have to fund whatever transportation alternatives it chooses to offer from other sources for years until its DART debt obligation is satisfied. The 1% sales tax will not be available until its share of debt is paid off.
6. Parking in the city is currently limited. If people coming into University Park to work or shop drive their cars instead of using DART, parking shortage would be exacerbated.
7. Not just University Park residents would be impacted if University Park were to leave. People coming into University Park to work and shop would also be impacted
8. If it leaves DART, the city would not be able to share in the recent enhancements, both financial and organizational, designed to entice cities to stay.
1. The region may experience tremendous growth in the future, but University Park will not. University Park is built out.
2. Current environmental controls are keeping our air reasonably healthy and should continue to do so in the future.
3. The city is at a disadvantage to growing cities in the Metroplex, such as Frisco, which do not dedicate 1 cent of their municipal sales tax to DART and instead have the option of using the money for a number of city programs such as economic development or public safety.
4. The city has stated it is committed to providing paratransit services for University Park residents. The Resolution passed by the City Council in February 2026 did not include commitment for any other transit option than paratransit.
5. The city could explore funding options necessary to pay for transportation options if it decides to provide them. The City is currently evaluating options with other service providers.
6. The City's available parking can handle any additional cars without negatively impacting residents.
7. People coming into University Park to work or shop can always drive to their locations.
8. In a few years University Park would be able to reauthorize the 1% sales tax for other programs once all its DART debt obligations are paid off.