Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

U.S. House, District 21

Primary Election: March 6, 2018Early Voting: February 20 - March 2, 2018
  • Candidate picture

    Matt McCall (Rep) Owner of McCall International Medical

  • Candidate picture

    Chip Roy (Rep) Lawyer

Change Candidates

Biographical Information

Explain your position on immigration to the U.S. Please address DACA, a pathway to citizenship, and border security.

What would you do to ensure affordable healthcare access for all citizens?

Identify three measures you would support that reduce gun violence.

What policies would you pursue to address safety and inequalities facing women and people of color?

Do you believe the government has a role in reducing student debt? Why or why not?

What are your legislative priorities for responding to our changing climate?

If spending cuts are necessary where would you cut the budget? Please be specific.

Background 20 years in the medical industry, contracting with the U.S. Military and exporting American-made products to distributors in Europe
Education Bachelors in Business and Economics, Westmont College
I believe in legal immigration. I believe in nationhood and that it defines us. The border is not an artificial line. However, as a country we are grappling with justice vs. mercy. Justice calls for exportation and a wall. Mercy knows that families and livelihoods are at stake. So, I believe in strong borders and nationhood. I believe in building a wall, physical or high-tech, so long as it works. I do not support any new path to citizenship. Once those things are settled, we need to redo our entire immigration system so it is fair and also takes into account the on-the-ground realities.
Republicans owe their constituents a full repeal and replacement of Obamacare and should follow it up with a free market. Women and men should decide for themselves what is adequate, affordable, and accessible. Free markets always drive value up and costs down. Interstate competition between insurance companies is a great place to start. In addition, the product approval process in the U.S. creates huge costs ultimately borne by the U.S. taxpayer. We must streamline the approval process and provide clear price signals so Americans can shop for the best value for their families.
First, we should get rid of all gun-free zones for licensed gun carriers (with the obvious exception of bars). When was the last time you heard about gun violence at a gun show or at a police station? Mass shootings only occur in gun-free zones. Second, we should recruit law-abiding citizens to take concealed gun classes. Third, we should encourage the NRA to offer free gun safety courses in high schools. Liberals want to teach 10-year olds how to use condoms, which I believe is entirely a family discussion. Gun safety is as much a social issue as sex education and just as practical.
I'm writing this on Martin Luther King Jr. day, and I'm reminded that we should judge by the content of character, not the color of skin. I reject racism in all forms. I reject sexism, and I believe in equal pay. I believe in equal opportunity. However, I do not believe in quotas or institutionalized favoritism. Just because an organization or company is predominately white or black, male or female, does not make it inherently racist or sexist. Everyone is privileged in some way compared to someone else. But all citizens deserve equal treatment under the law, and that is what I support.
The government has no role in reducing student debt. I believe America needs to get to a place where graduating high school means something. In today's world, a college degree means what a high school degree did thirty years ago. It is unfair to our youth to have the societal pressures of having to go to college to get a job that high school should have prepared them for. On the other hand, students freely choose their degrees and focuses of study with costs clearly being laid out to them beforehand. It is not the taxpayers' burden to rescue them if the financial cost-benefits don't add up.
Climate change happens, and humans clearly affect environments, but whether humans are causing world-wide temperature-based cataclysmic global warming is unclear at best. Ten years ago it was, "global warming," and now it is, "climate change," because the scientific models for warming didn't pan out and anything that happens can be categorized under the heading of, "climate change." I believe the environmental movement has been highjacked by socialists. I fully support clean air and clean water. I also fully support safe offshore drilling and the judicious use of our natural resources.
The current government report says there is $450 billion in waste, fraud, and duplication in the federal budget. If we eliminate that, it's a great start. America is currently $20 Trillion in debt. That the budget needs to be cut is self-evident. We need to get rid of entire departments of the government to change the narrative back to, "what do we really need?" Do we really need a Department of Education? America survived until 1978 without it. What else can we get rid of? It has to happen for us to be solvent.
Background Senate Judiciary Committee under Sen. Cornyn, Chief of Staff to Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Attorney General's Office, Texas Public Policy Foundation
Education B.S. and M.S. from University of Virginia, J.D. from University of Texas School of Law
Establish a truly secure border and immigration enforcement system first (border, visa overstays, workplace enforcement). Second, reduce legal immigration and overhaul it to focus on America’s needs (re-focused on labor/education/assimilation rather than family chain migration). All other questions should be addressed after these things have been met.
1) Repeal virtually all federal healthcare regulations that are prohibiting affordable healthcare in the first place. 2) Block grant Medicaid to the states and reduce the Medicaid expansion that is straining the system.
1) Enforce the gun laws on the books – but focus more heavily at the state level than the federal level. 2) Reduce government involvement beyond its core functions – and leave more money for safety and security (more resources to combat crime at the state and local level). 3) Continue to keep dangerous criminals in prison and off our streets (criminal justice reform should be focused on first-time, non-violent offenders).
We should encourage a government that focuses not on the color of skin, but on opportunity and equal justice under the law.

The best way to increase safety and opportunity for prosperity is to create a climate for strong economic growth, encourage the strong enforcement of our criminal laws, and take as many steps as possible to maintain the nuclear family. It is also in the interest of taxpayers and those who end up in trouble with the law to focus on reentry and rehabilitation, so that generally non-violent and non-repeat offenders are given a pathway to being productive members of society.
Yes – by no longer subsidizing them. Student loans should be competitive in the free market, not heavily regulated by the federal government. Too many students have been trapped underneath crushing student debt because the cost of tuition has artificially risen as credit and low interest rates have become readily available. If student loans were treated as other types of debt, there would be more caution before borrowing and, as a result, tuition rates would likely decrease as students became unwilling to borrow more.
We need to restore the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the limits set by Congress and return its focus on addressing actual measurable pollution that has a tangible negative impact on human health and the environment. I would support making permanent the reforms proposed by EPA Administrator Pruitt to permanently ban “sue and settle” practices and to eliminate conflicts of interest between citizens appointed to independent advisory boards caused by them also being dependent on federal funding. Finally, I would support delegating more environmental regulatory authority to the states.
They are necessary. We have $21 trillion in debt and no solution in sight. We have a spending problem not a revenue problem. I oppose restoration of earmarks in the appropriation process. I would support implementation of a “Sunset system” type process similar to the one in Texas. I would support block grants to the states. I favor automatic across-the-board cuts to spending to force decision-making to allocate spending. I would not vote to increase the debt ceiling without significant spending reforms associate with the increase.