I would be for lowering the signature requirements significantly to allow for an initiated resolution where the voters can have their principled views documented.
I like that the people can have a direct input into what they want to see for laws governing them.
I dislike that often times the people vote on specific statue or constitution language when it feels they are voting more on the principle of the subject.
When approached about signing a recreational marijuana initiative, I could tell I was annoying the circulator by wanting to read the exact language. Five other people signed quickly without reading saying "I'll sign for recreational weed"
I would be for better understanding of the exact words that are being voted on.