Change Address

VOTE411 Voter Guide

BUNCOMBE COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT SUPERVISOR {_getChooseLabel(this.selections.length)}

The non-paid board of supervisors meets monthly to establish local soil and water conservation priorities based on the needs of the district. The Board chairs work groups to address these priorities through the installation and implementation of best management practices that protect and improve the natural resources within the district. The work is accomplished by partnering with local, state and federal agencies; businesses; and non-profit organizations for technical and financial assistance. The Division of Soil and Water Conservation administers ACSP, AgWRAP and CCAP, and holds each local board of supervisors accountable to these state programs.Each district is governed by a five-member board of supervisors. Three supervisors are elected on the general ballot as non-partisan candidates during the regular election of county officers, and two are appointed by the NC Soil and Water Conservation Commission upon recommendation of the local district board of supervisors.

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    Anthony D. Cole
    (NON)

  • Candidate picture

    Alan Ditmore
    (NON)

  • Candidate picture

    Trent Duncan
    (NON)

  • Candidate picture

    Sara Nichols
    (NON)

Biographical Information

What experience and skills make you the best candidate for this office? (Max. 750 characters)

What are the most pressing needs currently facing your Soil and Water District, and what do you propose to address them? (Max. 750 characters)

What is the most effective service/program the Soil and Water District currently provides for your county? (Max. 750 characters)

Additional Comments (Max. 1000 characters)

Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Position/philosophy statement IVF pollutes, so ecofeminism has its limits. The main battles for abortion rights are for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon with AIPAC, not for Dixie with the Dems, and they are real battles, not court cases. Abortion rights for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon as on t
Current Occupation Handyman and childcare.
Age (optional) 61
Campaign Phone 828-683-6609
Campaign Email aditmore@juno.com
I have the best platform, and am registered unaffiliated which is public information in NC for a reason, and platform is the only prober basis for elections: IVF pollutes, so ecofeminism has its limits. The main battles for abortion rights are for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon with AIPAC, not for Dixie with the Dems, and they are real battles, not court cases. Abortion rights for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon as on the Golan Heights with AIPAC, for Poland as in Lugansk and for the Philippines as in Tibet; while Ukraine and Taiwan waste missiles and risk WW3 over trivial issues with the Dems. Donnie is pretty good at bombing abortion banners, for a guy who claims to be one. City abortion funding saves city school tax.
The least cost effective, greenwashed, "environmental" boondoggles have been nuclear power, by a mile, to which no nation has any "right", probably followed by gasohol, especially considering the number of small engines it has damaged. Abortion and contraception funding blows these and all other green projects away by orders of magnitude, making them all wasteful by comparison, and not worth defending. Buncombe farmland causes homelessness and long, polluting commutes from affordable homes in other counties and so should not be preserved by any active program; however, cost shared, soil and water protection systems might be wasted on farms that were immediately developed unless the systems were dual use, and so could continue to protect soi
Buncombe farmland causes homelessness and long, polluting commutes from affordable homes in other counties and so should not be preserved by any active program; however, cost shared, soil and water protection systems might be wasted on farms that were immediately developed unless the systems were dual use, and so could continue to protect soil and water during and after homebuilding; while abortion and contraception funding can preserve farmland in other counties, which can still qualify easily as locally grown.
IVF pollutes, so ecofeminism has its limits. The main battles for abortion rights are for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon with AIPAC, not for Dixie with the Dems, and they are real battles, not court cases. Abortion rights for Gaza, Syria and Lebanon as on the Golan Heights with AIPAC, for Poland as in Lugansk and for the Philippines as in Tibet; while Ukraine and Taiwan waste missiles and risk WW3 over trivial issues with the Dems. Donnie is pretty good at bombing abortion banners, for a guy who claims to be one. City abortion funding saves city school tax. The least cost effective, greenwashed, "environmental" boondoggles have been nuclear power, by a mile, to which no nation has any "right", probably followed by gasohol, especially considering the number of small engines it has damaged. Abortion and contraception funding blows these and all other green projects away by orders of magnitude, making them all wasteful by comparison, and not worth defending. Buncombe farmland causes homelessness
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.
Candidate has not yet responded.