Occupation
Attorney for 23 + years
Qualifications for office
I have been a trial attorney for 23+ years practicing Family Law and fighting for children and families during their most challenging times. I have real world courtroom experience in the family division which is where most judges get assigned and you need to have the right temperament and compassion to be in that division. I have the experience, temperament, compassion and values that makes a great judge. I want to stay in the family division until I retire.
Education
Juris Doctorate 2001, Duquesne University School of Law
Facebook
@heatherforjudge2025
X / Bluesky
@heatherforjudge.bsky.social
Instagram / TikTok
@hsbforjudge2025
I have been a family law attorney for over 23 years and have extensive experience in the Family court representing clients in trials, motions and conciliations on child custody, divorce, protection from abuse matters, grandparent custody, among other areas. I work with clients of all races, socioeconomic backgrounds, cultures, genders, sexual orientations, etc. In practicing family law, you need to have compassion and the right temperament to work with people who are going through the worst times of their lives. I also worked full time for the Allegheny County District Attorney's office through college and law school so I have a deep understanding of the criminal courts. Many of my cases are intertwined with all divisions of the court.
I will listen to both sides of the case openly and objectively and then carefully review the facts of the case along with any relevant evidence and then apply the law and any statutory factors that are required in making any decisions.
In my courtroom, everyone will be treated fairly and with respect and dignity, including litigants, attorneys and court personnel. I am committed to continuously educating myself and my court personnel on implicit bias to ensure that everyone is treated with fairness, respect and dignity. With Pro Se litigants, I will make sure to give them the time to present their cases and really listen to them. If it is something complex, I will make sure that they are aware of any free or reduced legal services that may be available to them.
Occupation
Common Pleas Judge
Qualifications for office
28 years as a trial lawyer
Education
BA, MBA, JD
Facebook
Keep Judge Bridges
X / Bluesky
@qbridges4judge
Instagram / TikTok
@qbridges4judge
As a criminal trial attorney, I have spent my career in the courtroom handling a wide range of cases, from complex investigations to jury trials. I have developed a deep understanding of the rules of evidence, criminal procedure, and courtroom practice. More importantly, I have learned to evaluate cases fairly, listen carefully, and make decisions under pressure. My experience has taught me the importance of impartiality, preparation, and respect for all parties. These are the same qualities that are essential for a judge, and I believe they prepared me to serve with integrity and fairness.
When two parties present, differing but valid, legal arguments, it is my responsibility as a judge to carefully consider the merits of each side without bias or preconceived notions. I would listen closely, review the relevant facts and applicable law, and ensure both parties are given a full and fair opportunity to be heard. Ultimately, my decision would be grounded in the law and guided by precedent, not personal opinion. Even in cases with strongly, opposing views, my role is to ensure a respectful courtroom environment, and to apply the law objectively and fairly.
Ensuring fairness for all individuals, whether represented by counsel or not, is a core responsibility of a judge. I would take steps to clearly explain courtroom procedures and expectations. I would use plain language when addressing self-represented individuals, and I would be patient in giving them the opportunity to present their case. Although, I must remain neutral and cannot give legal advice, I can make sure the process is understandable and that everyone has a meaningful chance to be heard. I would also ensure that decorum is maintained so that all parties feel respected and safe in my courtroom.
Occupation
Assistant District Attorney
Qualifications for office
24 years of experience as a trial attorney. 21 years overseeing the Elder Abuse Unit at the District Attorney's Office seeking justice for seniors who were preyed upon or exploited either by physical abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation.
Education
Duquesne University, B.A.; University of Pittsburgh, J.D.
Facebook
Capone for Judge
X / Bluesky
N/A
Instagram / TikTok
juliecaponeforjudge
I have 24 years' experience and have tried hundreds of cases. For the last 21 years, I've overseen the District Attorney's Elder Abuse Trial Unit and prosecuted only those who prey on seniors. I've also been a crime victim. That experience gives me unique perspective regarding how important it is to be compassionate and empathetic toward litigants and everyone who comes to court. Those of us who work in the courts may become desensitized to the intimidating nature of court proceedings.
Some of my Elder Abuse prosecutions were born of Orphan's Court proceedings. In those cases, I've observed those proceedings and reviewed transcripts. I've also had civil experience as a paralegal and when I participated in Pitt Law's Elder Clinic.
I would make sure each party was fully and fairly heard, and follow the law.
I would make sure that all individuals understood that they have a right to have counsel, and if they cannot afford counsel, are court appointed legal counsel. Every individual who came before me would be treated with the utmost respect, dignity and fairness. Court is a very scary process for anyone who finds themselves in that situation for whatever reason, and must be treated with the respect and dignity that all individuals deserve. I would make sure each party understands the process every step of the way.
Occupation
Judge
Qualifications for office
Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association with over twenty years of experience in child welfare law at the local, state, national, and international level.
Education
J.D. Temple University Beasley School of Law; M.S.W. University of Pennsylvania School of Social Work; B.A. American University
Facebook
facebook.com/Cowan4Judge
Instagram / TikTok
votecowan
I was appointed to the bench by Governor Shapiro and am serving as a Judge in the Family Division. I'm seeking election to a ten year term. In my prior career as an attorney, I appeared as the petitioning party, acting as sole counsel, in hundreds of child welfare cases that I tried to verdict. Many of these cases had companion adult criminal proceedings and dually adjudicated delinquent youth cases which required working on a multidisciplinary team to address the matters pending in all Divisions including with our counterparts in the Criminal Division. In addition, many of the matters that I handled proceeded to adoption and/or termination of parental rights proceedings as well as adult guardianship proceedings in the Orphans Division.
In all of my cases as an attorney, I took pride in the collaborative work I engaged in with opposing counsel to achieve positive outcomes that served the needs of all parties involved. I believe that my dual-degree background and interdisciplinary approach uniquely position me to address the complex challenges that frequently bring families into the courtroom with very different but equally valuable viewpoints. As a Judge, I mange my courtroom with a cooperative and collaborative approach. The tone I set is focused on treating everyone with dignity and respect, engaging in trauma-informed practice, and utilizing both my legal and social work skills to de-escalate high-conflict situations.
To me, justice means ensuring a level playing field for everyone who enters a courtroom. Despite various efforts by the legal community, legal services remain out of reach for many individuals. This is a significant issue because just and fair outcomes often depend on individuals being prepared and informed when they come to court. Expanding access to legal services across the socioeconomic spectrum is essential. Steps to achieve this include expanding pro bono programs, creating additional self-help centers, and encouraging attorneys to adopt a sliding-fee scale based on income and ability to pay. Additionally, all court system professionals, including judges, have a responsibility to contribute to public education about legal rights.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
Highly Recommended by Allegheny County Bar Association, 25 years as a trial attorney, Union Labor Attorney fighting for working families. Established Mental Health Court.
Education
Boston College, B.A. 1994, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, J.D., Magna Cum Laude, 1997
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/delucaforjudge/
X / Bluesky
https://x.com/i/flow/login?redirect_after_login=%2FDeLucaForJudge
Instagram / TikTok
https://www.instagram.com/delucaforjudge/
I have tried well over one hundred to verdict in the Pennsylvania courts including in every division of the Court of Common Please. My primary practice has been in the criminal courts and civil courts.
I have worked as a criminal defense attorney for over 20 years and have a special passion for helping those in the justice system with mental health challenges. In fact, I was heavily involved in the development of the Mental Health Court program.
Additionally, I have proudly spent over a decade fighting for better wages, healthcare, paid time off and better working conditions through my work as a union labor lawyer. Through my local unions, I represent workers in a wide array of jobs in the private and public sector.
Often, both parties have valid legal arguments. It is the role of the judge to determine which legal argument most closely applies to the factual situation of the case.
Of course sometimes the legal determination in a case is very close and in those circumstances a judge must draw upon experience to determine the most just result given the litigants situations, the factual situation and the law. For this reason it is very important to have judges with significant experience in the law.
I believe that my experience is the reason that I am Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association.
The judge must always protect the rights of the litigants in the courtroom. A judge must ensure that all parties are heard and given due process regardless of whether or not they have legal representation.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
Lawyer for the nation's largest industrial union with 25 years of legal experience in state and federal trial and appellate courts, state and federal administrative agencies, arbitration and mediation hearings; experienced judicial law clerk for state and federal court judges; former Pitt Law adjunct professor; experienced voter protection lawyer; trusted public servant elected twice to Allegheny County Council, appointed to Democratic National Committee, Port Authority Board and Pittsburgh Community Task Force on Police Reform
Education
Duke University, AB and Northeastern University School of Law, JD
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/VoteAmandaGreenHawkins/
My vast legal experience includes the Civil Division of Common Pleas Court but, I will draw from 25 years of legal experience, which makes me uniquely qualified. I've become familiar with the law in various forums and jurisdictions. This has sharpened my research skills, and my ability to multi-task, along with diversifying my knowledge in the law. In Common Pleas Court, a judge may hear cases where they are familiar, or maybe not as familiar, with the law. My career has been built on handling static matters while also quickly adapting to dynamic legal matters and researching and applying different areas of law. I'm ready to serve on day one in any division, and I'm committed to continuing education to stay current with legal developments.
This was a common situation when I was a judicial law clerk to state and federal judges and worked with them to draft their opinions and discuss the best outcomes. I may ask the parties to submit, in writing, legal arguments considering the alternatives and outcomes and why the alternatives are or aren't appropriate under the circumstances. In the end, I would follow the law and make the decision that I think is best, and I would fully explain the basis for the decision and the reasons the alternative argument was outweighed.
First and foremost, I would treat people with dignity and respect, which is essential for people to be heard and for due process. I would also take time to explain the legal process for the case, the importance of each phase or step, and the basis for each decision made. Also, bias must be interrupted and disrupted so that it doesn't impact decisions. I'd start with honestly assessing my own biases and determining whether I would treat someone differently if they were different than they appeared or presented. Any biases would need to be addressed by refuting stereotypes, changing perspectives to gain another point of view, and being intentionally thoughtful in my interactions with people. This is my habit to keep bias out of my decisions.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
Trial attorney for 11 years as a child abuse and juvenile prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, juvenile delinquency defense attorney, child welfare counsel (for parents and children in the dependency system), special solicitor in child welfare cases for OCYF, family law attorney (divorce, custody, support, and protection from abuse matters), and civil attorney. Judicial Law Clerk from 2014-2015 and Juvenile Probation Officer from 2006-2014.
Education
J.D. in 2013 from Duquesne University School of Law (evening division) and Bachelors of Arts Degree (majored in Political Science and History) in 2006 from Seton Hill University
Facebook
Hickton For Judge
Instagram / TikTok
Jaime Hickton for Judge
In my private practice, I represent criminal defendants in all matters (from summary traffic citations to homicide cases) and I've handled numerous pre-trial motions proceedings, non-jury trial, jury trials, and post-trial motions. I also represent juvenile defendants in delinquency matters (from summary traffic citations to serious felony offenses). I represent parents as legal counsel and children (both as legal counsel and guardian ad litem) in child welfare/dependency matters. I also represent the child welfare agency in another county as a special solicitor. Lastly, I represent clients in family law matters (divorce, custody, support, protection from abuse, termination of parental rights, and adoptions).
When both parties have valid legal arguments, the matter often comes down to a determination of the facts which are impacted by credibility determinations made by the court. I would give both parties the opportunity to present their case, I would consider the evidence and testimony, and then I would make a credibility determination of the evidence and testimony to find the facts. Once I determined the facts, I would apply those facts to the law and render a decision consistent with the law.
Every person who enters the courtroom is entitled to be treated with dignity and respect. Most of the issues that I've encountered within the court system stem from courts who do not, as a standard, treat everyone with dignity and respect. I would make sure that everyone has an opportunity to be heard and that their case be judged fairly on the facts and law instead of giving an advantage to one side over the other due to explicit or implicit bias.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
I have over 20 years of legal experience and have practiced in all divisions of the Court of Common Pleas, including 10 years practicing in Family Division, where new judges take the bench. I have worked in health care, government and the private sector, clerked for the Superior Court and led the Allegheny County Bar Association as its President during the pandemic.
Education
BS- Psychology, Clarion University of PA; JD- University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Facebook
Elizabeth Hughes for Judge
Instagram / TikTok
votehughesforjudge
I have practiced law for 20 years across all 4 divisions of the court. About half of that time was spent in Family Division. This is key because new judges often start here, and families coming to court deserve someone who knows the system. I am currently a health law attorney, serving as primary counsel for three major area hospitals, including the region’s premier pediatric specialty hospital. Before becoming a lawyer, I worked in child mental health as a case worker. As an Assistant Solicitor for Allegheny County, I handled thousands of involuntary commitment hearings to ensure that some of our community’s most vulnerable residents received the care they needed, so I also have significant Orphans' Court experience.
If two parties in my courtroom present differing views but both offer valid legal arguments, my role as a judge is to remain impartial and carefully evaluate the merits of each side. I would thoroughly analyze the facts, review the supporting evidence presented, apply the relevant law, and consider precedents and legal reasoning presented. I may also need to consider other factors such as who has the burden of proof and if there are any broader policy implications to consider. My goal would be to issue a decision that is equitable, just, and follows the law, ensuring that both parties feel heard and respected in the process. Judicial integrity requires balancing legal analysis with a commitment to impartiality, even in complex cases.
I would make sure that bias has no place in my courtroom and that I work hard to demystify the court process. I believe that judges have a responsibility to get out into the community and help educate the public on the courts and I believe that engaging regularly with the community can assist in making the courts less intimidating. I would also make sure that I am constantly self-evaluating for possible bias, as we all are susceptible to falling prey to this and must remain vigilant. I would also make sure that my courtroom is one where respect and courtesy is the rule for all those present and it is my job to set the tone from the bench. I will also ensure that litigants have accommodations that they require to address any special needs.
Occupation
Criminal Defense - Crimmigration Attorney
Qualifications for office
Lauren has advocated for thousands of clients at every stage of trial across Allegheny County and has spent thousands of hours in the court room. Lauren oversaw 30 pro bono projects while working for the Toll Public Interest Center at Penn Law School - from voting to tenants rights, and she clerked for the Honorable Mia Roberts Perez. Lauren has volunteered on the border. She also founded the Immigration Consequences Group, which advises clients about potential immigration outcomes, coordinates with local and international immigration organizations, and lectures locally and statewide.
Education
undergrad, University of Pennsylvania, Bachelor of Arts with Distinction in Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies, Magna Cum Laude; law school, Temple University Beasley School of Law
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/LLforCP
X / Bluesky
@LLforCP
Instagram / TikTok
@LLforCP
I mostly practice in the Criminal Division. I have a broad trial experience in cases ranging from DUIs to attempted homicide. I’ve conducted thousands of hearings, argued motions, and handled both bench and jury trials. I also advise on immigration matters. My background brings a unique perspective to the courtroom, grounded in understanding incarceration and rehabilitation. My civil experience is more limited but includes work in patent/trademark law, torts, name changes, depositions, and discovery. I’ve also drafted wills, reviewed divorce decrees, and represented teens in criminal cases. I am currently up to date on my CLE’s through 2026 and plan to maintain the same drive to stay current with the law.
I would ensure both parties are fully heard and respected, recognizing the validity of each argument. I’d carefully evaluate the facts and legal reasoning, focusing on which position aligns most closely with the law. I would allow the parties to brief is necessary and allow the parties time to present case law as long as it's done in an efficient and timely matter. Ultimately, I would make a fair, impartial decision based on the legal merits, even if it’s the more difficult choice—because doing the right thing under the law is always my priority.
In court, individuals are allowed to proceed pro se, even if it may not be in their best interest. No matter what type of case it is, if an individual is proceeding pro se, I would inform the individual of their right to an attorney or the benefits from having an attorney. I would allow individuals, within reason, to postpone their case to acquire an attorney. In some cases it may be appropriate to appoint an attorney to an individual.
It would be my role as a judge to balance the individuals rights on how they wish to proceed, what is in their best interest, and making sure every party is making an informed decision on how they wish to proceed so that the case can proceed in a timely fashion.
Occupation
Employment Attorney
Education
Bachelors in Politics and Philosophy, Economics from University of Pittsburgh. J.D from University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Facebook
Amy Mathieu for Judge
Instagram / TikTok
@amyforall25
I attended the University of Pittsburgh for both undergraduate studies and law school. Following law school, I clerked for The Honorable Judge Christine Ward of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division. After my clerkship concluded, I practiced complex commercial litigation at Eckert Seamans. After that, I practiced personal injury law at Woomer & Talarico. I then moved to Marsh Law, a firm specializing in litigating civil cases involving sexual abuse civil, sexual assault, and child sex abuse materials. I now work at HKM Employment Law, handling workplace discrimination cases and representing survivors of sexual abuse in civil claims.
This is the very basis of our legal system. First, I believe that a judge’s job includes looking for reasonable compromises. A judge should always try to facilitate helping the opposing parties resolve their legal issues in a way that benefits both parties. As a practicing attorney, I always try to do what’s best for my client and often find creative solutions to difficult issues. If there simply is no room for compromise, then I would be open-minded to both arguments and ultimately weigh the relevant case law, legal arguments presented, and moral principles.
No litigant should have the outcome of their cases decided by their race, identity, or the amount of money in their bank account. Judges need to be surrounded by and informed by people from many different perspectives, which I will reflect in my hiring practices. My first goal would be to provide resources to pro se litigants, such as free legal services or community organizations that offer free or low-cost legal services, to see if they could obtain competent representation. If the litigant chose to proceed pro se, I would approach them with patience and understanding. Court processes are complex, and I would take my time to fully explain their legal rights and options in plain language and from a trauma-informed perspective. Additionally
Occupation
Attorney and Legislator
Qualifications for office
Attorney and Legislator, Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association
Education
Western Connecticut State University, BA in History 1996, BS in Secondary Education 1997; Catholic University, Columbus School of Law, 2002
Facebook
www.facebook.com/VoteDanMiller
X / Bluesky
x.com/VoteDanMiller / bsky.app/profile/votedanmiller.bsky.social
Instagram / TikTok
www.instagram.com/votedanmiller/
I spent 11 years as a public defender and a county solicitor with experience in Criminal, Orphans’ and Family, making thousands of court appearances during this time, primarily in Family. For 11 years as a state legislator, I prioritized disability, mental health, juvenile justice and labor rights. I have received numerous disability and mental health advocacy awards and currently serve as a lawyer at Ruder Law handling special education matters. As Vice Chair of the House Judiciary Committee I have debated and analyzed law that impacts everyone of our courts. I received a “Highly Recommended” rating from our Bar Association and believe my experience in practicing and writing law is a key qualification for me to be elected to the bench.
Judges of course can only apply and interpret the law, they cannot create it. Ultimately it is the job of any judge to make a decision based on the facts presented. It has been my experience in the court that “valid legal arguments” are typically not the purview of one side or another- few attorneys offer an invalid legal argument. But arguments based on law with a fact pattern most similar to precedent and in line with legislative intent should be most successful.
Equality before the law has always been our intent, but our history is replete with examples of our failure to administer it equally. This is a responsibility of everyone in our courts to work to improve.
The key issue regarding pro se litigants is whether they fully understand their rights- not just to proceed without an attorney, but to proceed with one free of charge if they qualify. Judges need to make sure these rights are explained effectively (and that attorneys have an appropriate amount of time to prepare the case and their clients). Pro se litigants may benefit from a judge appointing an attorney to assist them too- not to take over the case, but to help safeguard rights and improve understanding.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
I have over 35 years of courtroom experience across every division of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. I have served as President of the Allegheny County Bar Association and was appointed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to both the Disciplinary Board and the Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts (IOLTA) Board. I have consistently contributed pro bono legal work throughout my career and am proud to be rated Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association. My experience, commitment to fairness, and dedication to the legal profession have prepared me to serve as a judge.
Education
I earned my Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Pennsylvania in 1986 and my Juris Doctor from Boston University School of Law in 1989.
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/VoteNeft
Instagram / TikTok
@VoteNeft
I have over 35 years of experience practicing in the Civil, Criminal, Family, and Orphans' Divisions of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. My strongest experience is in civil litigation, but I have handled matters across all divisions, including Protection from Abuse cases, criminal defense, and estate matters. This broad background prepares me to serve effectively in any assignment. I plan to stay current with legal developments by continuing my regular participation in CLE programs, staying active in professional organizations, and maintaining strong relationships within the legal community.
As a judge, my role is to approach each case with impartiality, carefully evaluate the facts, and apply the law as it is written. When both parties present valid legal arguments, I would thoroughly review the evidence and legal standards, weigh the credibility of the arguments, and render a decision based solely on the law and the record. Respect for both parties, active listening, and clear reasoning are essential to ensuring fairness and maintaining public trust in the court.
I would ensure that every individual, represented or not, is treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. My work on the Pennsylvania IOLTA Board, which supports access to legal services for underserved communities, has reinforced my belief that everyone deserves a fair hearing. In my courtroom, I would explain procedures clearly, listen carefully, and apply the law impartially to ensure justice is accessible to all.
Occupation
Attorney
Qualifications for office
I have been a practitioner, law clerk, and hearing officer in the field of Family Law for over twenty years. Prior to becoming a licensed attorney, I was a law student intern in a law firm that focused on Family Law. As a member of the Duquesne University School of Law Law Review, I published an article entitled, “Maintaining the Legal Fiction: Application of the Presumption of Paternity and Paternity by Estoppel in Pennsylvania”. I have been a frequent presenter on Family Law topics with the Matrimonial Inns of Court, Allegheny County Bar Association, and Pennsylvania Bar Association
Education
Duquesne University, Bayer School of Natural and Environmental Sciences B.S. Chemistry, Minor, Mathematics, 2000 & Duquesne University, School of Law (now known as the Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University) J.D., cum laude, 2004 Law Review
Facebook
facebook.com/Jackieo4Judge
X / Bluesky
N/A
Instagram / TikTok
@Jackieo4Judge
My primary area of practice for the past 20 years has been Family Law, but I have 13 years of experience in Criminal Division as a Law Clerk to Judge Tom Flaherty and have litigated a few matters in Civil Division and Orphan’s Court.
With respect to Family Division, I have litigated custody, support, divorce, protection from abuse, dependency, and appellate matters on behalf of clients. I served as Judge Flaherty’s Law Clerk while he was assigned to the Family Division and was appointed as a Discovery Master for complex divorce cases. For the past 6 years, I have been a Divorce Hearing Officer where I preside over hearings and conciliations related to economic claims incident to divorce, complex support, and other related matters.
As a Divorce Hearing Officer, I have encountered this situation frequently, as the parties oftentimes have differing perspectives on the underlying facts and circumstances of their case and each party presents a different legal theory that justifies their requested relief. After determining the credibility of the parties’ testimony and considering all other evidence presented, I conduct a thorough review of case law to ascertain whether there is a similar factual scenario to the facts presented which would guide my decision regarding which legal theory to apply. If the case involves a novel factual situation and there is no precedential case law, I look to constitutional law, statutory law, and public policy to reach my conclusion.
As a litigator, judicial law clerk, and hearing officer, my approach has always been to treat all litigants with dignity and respect, to hear each case in a fair and impartial manner, and to ensure an equitable outcome for all litigants.
Occupation
Attorney and Entrepreneur
Qualifications for office
35 years of experience in the law
Education
BA & JD
Facebook
Carmen Robinson
I served as a law clerk on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court under the Late Hon. Max Baer for one year, and for two Family Court Judges, Hon. Dwayne Woodruff and Hon. Kim Clark, for a total of ten years. I have practiced law for nearly twenty years, with approximately 85% of my practice focusing on criminal law. I have tried cases to jury decisions, including homicide cases where the death penalty might be imposed. This is my second career; I served over fifteen years as a Pittsburgh Police Officer and attained the rank of SGT. With more than 35 years of experience in diverse areas of law, including estates and trusts, personal injury cases as plaintiff’s counsel, I am qualified to serve in any division.
When two parties have very different views, but both are presenting valid legal arguments, I would interpret & apply the law to the issues at stake. I would test the arguments of each side to understand the impact, and above all else make a fair & impartial decision. Judges have discretion and apply the law according to beliefs that include both personal & professional experience. Having certain experiences can call into question impartiality or objectivity. When personal experience could drive the decision, I would recuse myself. Two Judges’ interpretations of the law can vary and be lawful. Finally, the role of judge is not merely to follow precedents but also to adapt the law to fit the evolving social, cultural, & economic landscape.
Ensuring a fair & impartial trial is essential for public trust. A judge upholds justice by balancing interests within legal proceedings. The integrity of the process relies on key components working together to prevent bias and to ensure equality before the law. Depending on the division, ensuring constitutional rights becomes fundamental to a fair trial. In Criminal Court, I would appoint counsel if the Defendant didn't have counsel. If a Defendant insisted on self-representation, I would appoint standby counsel to assist. I would also ensure the process itself was not inherently biased. For instance, an incarcerated defendant representing himself should have access to all necessary tools to adequately defend himself.
Occupation
Judge
Qualifications for office
Current Judge 2022 - Present, Mayor of Sharpsburg 2018 - 2021, Sharpsburg Council Member 2011 - 2017
Education
Washington & Jefferson College in 2008, majoring in history and German. Law degree from the Duquesne University Kline School of Law.
Facebook
www.facebook.com/judgerudzki
X / Bluesky
bsky.app/profile/judgerudzki.bsky.social
Instagram / TikTok
www.instagram.com/judgerudzki/
Before taking the bench in 2022, the bulk of my practice was within the Civil and Orphans Divisions, with occasional appearances in the Criminal Division, and with limited practice in the Family Division. I appeared in motions court, status conferences, pleas, and before administrative bodies such as the Board of Property Assessment Appeals, the Board of Viewers, and Sheriff’s Sales. My time spent before judges and hearing officers exposed me to a wide array of judicial approaches and temperaments, all of which has had an impact on how I approach my role as a district judge and helped me develop a judicial temperament that is calm, patient, respectful, courteous, and dignified.
This comes down to judicial temperament. Lawyers are zealous advocates in an adversarial system—the exact opposite of what we expect from our judges as neutral arbiters. My collective experiences over thousands of cases in my court and presiding over matters for colleagues and at Pittsburgh Municipal Court have helped me develop a proven temperament that is calm, patient, respectful, courteous, and dignified.
Through the proper judicial temperament, you can make both parties feel heard. That way everyone leaves the courtroom feeling they had their story heard and are more likely to accept the outcome, even if they might not like it.
Fairness requires a judge to deliver on many fronts: being dignified, equitable, impartial, and patient, among others. As a former teacher, councilor, and mayor, and as a sitting judge, I have always been aware of the needs of the people I serve.
We know that disparities exist in our justice system and we must be attuned to address those disparities by striving to deliver due process to all parties appearing before the courts and ensuring that they are also treated equitably. This absolutely must include ensuring that parties are in contact with the public defender's office if they are eligible for their services.
Occupation
Magisterial District Judge, Attorney
Qualifications for office
I have been an attorney for 30 years. I was a Deputy Attorney General for 10 years. I then entered private practice where I primarily focused on criminal defense. I was a Hearing Examiner for the Liquor Control Board. For the past 5+ years, I have been a Magisterial District Judge. I am the only candidate who has been a prosecutor, defense attorney and a Judge. I have experience in trials, appeals and grand jury cases. I have experience on all sides.
Education
Duquesne University, BA, cum laude; Dickinson School of Law, JD
Facebook
Santicola for Judge
Instagram / TikTok
Santicola for Judge
I was a prosecutor and criminal defense attorney and have experience in jury trials, bench trials and grand jury cases. I have also presided over thousands of preliminary hearings as a Magisterial District Judge, including homicide cases. I have also practiced in the civil division as a Deputy Attorney General, representing the Commonwealth in consumer protection cases. As a Magisterial District Judge, I have presided over thousands of civil cases. I have ruled on admissibility of evidence, credibility of witnesses and applied the facts to the law. I have also presided over hundreds of Protection from Abuse ex parte hearings, which fall under the Family Law umbrella. As a Judge, I will continue to attend classes to stay current.
I regularly handle this situation. And my approach is the same as it is in every case. I listen to both sides. I give both sides the opportunity to be fully heard. I respect everyone who walks into my courtroom. Often times, both sides present good and valid arguments. That is what makes the job of a judge so difficult. But it's also what makes it so important. A judge must interpret and follow the law. That is what I do and what I pledge to do if I am elected to the Court of Common Pleas.
I regularly have pro se litigants in my courtroom. I take great care to make sure they are treated fairly and with respect. I understand that legal representation is extremely expensive and out of reach for many. I also understand that people's lives are significantly impacted by the decisions that are made when they come to court, and without representation, they are at a disadvantage. I do everything I can to make sure pro se litigants are given the opportunity to present their cases and be fully and fairly heard.
Occupation
Magisterial District Judge
Qualifications for office
District Judge for 10 years. Former Allegheny County Assistant Solicitor. Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association
Education
Duquesne University B.S. Duquesne University School of Law J.D.
Facebook
Elect Judge Craig Stephens
I have extensive experience in the Family Division as a former CYF and child support Attorney with the Allegheny County Law Department. I have experience in the Civil Division representing Allegheny County handling tax appeal matters and civil litigation. I have experience in the Orphan’s Division handling mental health commitment hearings and guardianships as a County attorney. I also have 10 years experience as a District Judge handling criminal and civil cases. I believe I have sufficient experience in all the Divisions of the Court of Common Pleas. I stay current with legal developments because I am mandated to attend and complete continuing eduction courses as a Magisterial District Judge.
I would weigh the evidence and review the testimony and any applicable case law and statutes. Each case has its own unique set of facts and circumstances. However, every case that comes before me is handled in the same manner.
Any individual that appears in front of me regardless of whether they are an Attorney or representing themselves are treated fairly and with dignity and respect. In every case, each side is given the opportunity to present their case, introduce any evidence and make their arguments to the Court.
Occupation
Defense Attorney
Qualifications for office
Criminal Defense Attorney since 2024, prior Deputy District Attorney supervising the Domestic Violence Unit from 2016-2024, Assistant District Attorney 2000-2016. 25 years of trial experience specializing in the pursuit of justice for domestic violence victims with experience in all aspects of criminal law with additional practice in family law.
Education
Juris Doctorate - Duquesne University Thomas R Kline School of Law 1999, Bachelors of Science in Political Science and Minor in Communication Arts - Allegheny College 1996
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/share/1AUMdUxLbk/?mibextid=wwXIfr
X / Bluesky
@Sullivan4Judge
Instagram / TikTok
@Sullivan4Judge
I’ve been an attorney for 25 years, focusing primarily on criminal and family law. Most of my career was spent as a Domestic Violence Prosecutor in the Allegheny County DA’s Office, where I handled a wide range of cases including assaults, sexual assaults, child sex crimes, robberies, burglaries, and around 30 homicides. I also prosecuted violations of Protection From Abuse (PFA) orders. Currently, I practice criminal defense and PFA matters. I've handled 40–50 jury trials, countless non-jury trials in the Court of Common Pleas, and hundreds of preliminary hearings. I have not practiced in Civil Division or Orphans’ Court.
This situation arises often in our courts, where the facts become the deciding factor. Credibility of witnesses and the weight of each piece of evidence usually determine the outcome. That’s why it’s vital for a judge to be an engaged listener who asks key questions when needed. Even the smallest detail can make a difference. When novel legal issues arise, a judge should think creatively, drawing from similar legal concepts in other areas. Ultimately, a judge must resolve each case with a strong sense of fairness, justice, and practical judgment.
Ensuring all parties can present their case is a core duty of a judge. Whether represented or not, each party deserves a fair opportunity. A judge must apply rules of evidence and procedure fairly, preventing misuse—especially against unrepresented individuals. Access to legal counsel is essential, and I will always ensure counsel is appointed when entitled. I also support expanding the right to counsel in critical matters like housing. Cases must be heard without undue delay, as prolonged proceedings can cause economic hardship and other burdens. A judge must be mindful of these impacts and promote timely, just outcomes.
Occupation
Lawyer
Qualifications for office
I have 13 years of experience as a defense attorney, and I've handled many differnt types of cases. I also served as a judicial law clerk in the Family Division for the last 12 years. In these combined roles, I have experience in all four divisions of the Court of Common Pleas, and would be prepared to start on day one if I were elected.
Education
B.A. from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington and a J.D. from Duquesne University's Kline School of Law
Facebook
@Vote for Sarra
Instagram / TikTok
@Voteforsarra
I have been a practicing attorney for the past 13 years where I focus on criminal defense cases and civil matters. I served as a judicial law clerk for 12 years in the family division where I conducted legal writing and research for divorce, custody and juvenile court cases. I have also written hundreds of judicial opinions on termination of parental rights cases, which are heard in Orphans Court. I have a very broad range of experience in the Court of Common Pleas. I do not handle any estate law cases as a part of my practice so that is the one area of Orphans Court that I would need to learn. Things are constantly changing so I would be sure to familiarize myself with the law and any monitor any changes to it.
I would approach every case with an open mind and consider all arguments made by the parties. Judges are tasked with applying the law to the facts of each case. I would be sure to explain the rationale behind every decision so that the parties could understand how I arrived at that conclusion.
It would be a requirement in my courtroom that everyone be treated with respect. Not only would I abide by this rule but everyone who had business in the court would be expected to do the same. Oftentimes, a court experience is incredibly stressful to begin with. The judge sets the tone of the courtroom, and I would hope to be as empathetic and compassionate as possible and to treat everyone with dignity.
Occupation
Lawyer
Qualifications for office
With nearly 30 years as a CIVIL litigator and arbitrator, Dennis is pleased to be uniquely positioned to meet a critical need of the Court right now which sets him apart from the other candidates. The critical need-5 of the 8 judges that vacated the bench and need to be replaced in this election were CIVIL Division Judges, 5 of 8. For almost 30 years, Dennis has continuously represented all types of clients in, effectively, every type of case that comes before the CIVIL Division-a unique perspective and great judicial training. (See dennisvery.com to learn more about Dennis's qualifications).
Education
University of Notre Dame, Bachelor of Business Administration with a Concentration in Finance, 1991; Duquesne University School of Law, Juris Doctor, with distinction, 1995 (Evening Division).
Facebook
Dennis Very for Judge
Uniquely, my legal experience began prior to my graduation from Law School. While in law school, I was certified with the County Law Dept.– representing Children and Youth Services during the day in Juvenile Court and going to law school at night. For 30 years after law school, I continued to focus on civil litigation in various state & Federal Courts throughout the country. I earned a position with the nationally renowned law firm where I zealously represented clients for 10 years concentrating on complex commercial civil litigation cases. I have worked in-house, as a solicitor for municipal clients, and represented all types of clients in all types of civil cases continuously. I remain current with the law with classes & reading case law.
Like any case that would be before the Court, I would be well prepared for the arguments by deliberately and thoroughly understanding any motions or briefings filed in the case. I would identify the proper legal standard for the case to be applied to the arguments, taking into account the current procedural posture. I would allow the parties to make their arguments in full, addressing the Court and not each other, while being courteous to the litigants, the attorneys, the court staff, and all those present in the courtroom in a welcoming and open manner. I would apply the standard of my review to the arguments and make my decision, never prejudging as this would be an affront to the legal process. I would be VERY Fair & VERY Just.
A judge must ensure fairness and impartiality in the courtroom – which also alleviates bias. To maintain fairness and impartiality in the courtroom if elected, I would try to be as self-aware of bias as possible and be open and welcoming to routine training on the issue. I would try to ensure diverse and representative jury selection, be mindful in applying the law consistently, ensure that all participants in the proceedings are treated with respect – addressing any improper conduct immediately, and ensure that barriers to equal access of justice, such as language hurdles, disabilities, or lack of representation are accommodated with interpreters, fair treatment, and clear directions as to expectations and how the matter will proceed.
Occupation
Judge
Qualifications for office
Magisterial District Judge, January 2022 to present; civil litigation attorney with extensive jury, non-jury, and arbitration experience in Pennsylvania and Ohio in state and federal courts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants, 2003-2021; Judicial Law Clerk, York County Court of Common Pleas, 2002-2003; admitted to practice in Pennsylvania in 2002 and in Ohio in 2005.
Education
B.A., Psychology, 1999, The Ohio State University; J.D., 2002, Penn State Dickinson School of Law
Facebook
www.facebook.com/judgewheatleyforcommonpleas
I have more than 20 years of experience representing clients in Civil
and Orphans Division matters, with extensive jury and non-jury trial work. I served as an appointed arbitrator for more than 100 Allegheny County Civil Division cases.
As an elected Magisterial District Judge since 2022, I have presided over hundreds of hearings for civil cases; over more than 1000 Preliminary Arraignments and Preliminary Hearings in criminal cases; have reviewed hundreds of search warrant and arrest warrant requests; and have presided over hundreds of requests for Emergency PFAs.
I stay current with legal developments through continuing education, seminars, review of legal publications, and active engagement with judicial and legal peer networks.
In my more than three years serving as a Magisterial District Judge, I have frequently encountered this situation. These cases often involve differing recollections, perspectives, and motivations. In handling such matters, I begin by actively listening to ensure that each party has a full and fair opportunity to present their case. I assess the credibility of witnesses and the reliability of the evidence presented, weighing the facts as they emerge from the testimony and documentation. Once I have determined the facts, I apply the law objectively and impartially. My goal is to always reach a decision that is grounded in a thorough analysis of the facts and a fair application of the law.
I am committed to ensuring that all individuals—regardless of whether they have legal representation—are treated with fairness, respect, and dignity in my courtroom. I clearly explain courtroom procedures and legal rights in plain language, remain patient and attentive, and ensure that self-represented parties have a meaningful opportunity to present their case. I provide tools to make court accessible, including, among others, translation services and virtual court appearances. I avoid legal jargon where possible and actively manage proceedings to maintain an even playing field. My goal is to create an environment where all participants feel heard and where justice is administered impartially, transparently, and in accordance with the law.
Occupation
Deputy District Attorney
Qualifications for office
26 years of experience as an Allegheny County Prosecutor specializing in homicides and gun violence. Extensive trial experience having tried over 400 before judges including 60 homicide trials. Supervisor of the Violent Crimes and Firearms unit where I lead a team of attorney’s in prosecuting most gun violence in Allegheny County.
Education
Juris Doctorate - University of Pittsburgh School of Law 1998, Bachelors of Science in Industrial Management with a Minor in Architecture - Carnegie Mellon University 1994
Facebook
@Zur4Judge
X / Bluesky
@Zur4Judge
Instagram / TikTok
@Zur4Judge
I’ve spent 26 years in the Criminal Division, trying over 400 cases, including 60 homicides, and currently serve as Deputy District Attorney overseeing the Violent Crimes and Firearms Division. This experience has given me extensive knowledge of criminal law, courtroom procedure, and our constitutional protections. I also have some experience in the Family Division with cases involving juvenile offenders. While I lack direct experience in Civil and Orphans’ Court, I’m committed to learning and staying current through CLEs, judicial training, and collaboration with colleagues to ensure every case receives the attention and care it deserves.
In situations where both parties present valid legal arguments, my role as a judge is to remain impartial, carefully listen, and ensure that each side is fully heard and respected. I would analyze the facts, apply the relevant law, and consider the credibility and weight of the evidence and legal precedent. My goal would be to make a fair, well-reasoned decision based solely on the law and the record before me. Even when views differ sharply, every party deserves a courtroom that is respectful, balanced, and guided by justice—not personal bias or emotion.
To ensure fairness for all individuals, with or without legal representation, I would maintain a respectful, patient, and accessible courtroom. I’d clearly explain procedures and expectations in plain language, ensuring self-represented individuals understand their rights, the process, and have access to necessary services. While a judge cannot offer legal advice, I can ensure they have a meaningful opportunity to be heard and the space to present their case. I would hold attorneys to high standards of professionalism and ensure no one is disadvantaged due to lack of representation.
